TL;DR
Get business pricing on garage and car supplies
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
Road.cc’s review of Nutrak’s TPU tube with a copper Presta valve found it performed without punctures during the test, but the reviewer could not draw conclusions about long-term durability. At 56.8g, it is lighter than the reviewer’s 138.4g butyl tube but heavier and bulkier than the TPU alternatives tested, leading to a 5/10 overall rating.
Road.cc’s review of Nutrak’s TPU inner tube found that it worked without punctures during testing, while its thicker construction and copper Presta valve give it a more substantial feel than lightweight alternatives. The tube weighed 56.8g in the review, and the tester said its extra weight and bulk made it harder to justify against lighter, more compact TPU tubes.
The reviewer described the tube as a middle ground between butyl and lightweight TPU: it retains a considerable weight saving over a conventional butyl tube, while using thicker TPU and a metal valve. The tester recorded no punctures or other problems during use, but stressed that this short-term experience does not establish long-term durability.
In the review’s measurements, the Nutrak tube weighed 56.8g, compared with 138.4g for the tester’s standard butyl tube. Two TPU alternatives in the test weighed 27.8g for a standard-size tube and 48.9g for a gravel tube designed for 40–50mm tyres. The reviewer also found the Nutrak larger when packed, saying roughly two standard TPU tubes would fit in the space occupied by one Nutrak.
The tester rated the product 5/10 overall, with 8/10 for quality and performance and 5/10 for value. The review said the metal valve felt more robust than plastic stems found on many lightweight TPU tubes, a potential advantage for riders using some electric pumps. The manufacturer’s product description claims high air retention and corrosion resistance, but the supplied review material does not report independent measurements of either.
The Cost of a More Substantial Tube
For cyclists choosing a spare or replacement inner tube, the review highlights a practical trade-off: the Nutrak saves weight compared with the tested butyl tube, but is heavier and bulkier than the TPU alternatives included in the comparison. Those differences can matter to riders who prioritize carrying compact spares or reducing bike weight.
The metal Presta valve may appeal to riders concerned about how a pump attaches to plastic valve stems. But the reviewer questioned whether that feature and the tube’s more substantial build justify the additional weight, size and cost. The review’s assessment is specific to its test and comparisons; it does not establish that the tube will be more durable over extended use.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How It Compared in Testing
The review places the Nutrak product within a market where TPU tubes are commonly chosen for their lower weight and smaller packed size than traditional butyl tubes. Its stated design approach is to make the TPU wall thicker and pair it with a copper valve, prioritizing a sturdier construction over the lightest possible package.
For comparison, the tester reported that some retailers offered two standard lightweight TPU tubes for about £11. The review also cited a PSIKIC TPU tube previously tested at £15.99 and said Tubolito products could often be found below their recommended retail prices. The material supplied does not specify Nutrak’s price, so a direct price comparison cannot be calculated here. The reviewer described its price as fairly typical but still rated value at 5/10.
“I had no punctures or problems with the Nutrak tubes during testing, although that’s obviously not enough to make any definitive claims about long-term durability.”
— Farrelly Atkinson, road.cc reviewer
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Durability and Price Still Unsettled
The test material does not give the length or conditions of the riding test, and the reviewer’s lack of punctures should not be taken as proof that the thicker tube lasts longer than other TPU products. No long-term comparison or durability test is reported.
The supplied information also does not state Nutrak’s retail price, the exact tube size tested, or whether the weight varies by size. Manufacturer claims about air retention and valve corrosion resistance are not backed here by measured comparative results. The reported 56.8g figure is the reviewer’s measurement; the product information separately lists a weight of 56g.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Check Fit, Weight and Price
The review provides no announced follow-up test or product update. Riders considering the tube can compare its valve type, fit and measured weight with alternatives for their tyre size, and check current retailer pricing before buying. Those comparing durability should treat the reviewer’s puncture-free test as limited evidence, not a long-term guarantee.
Any later assessment would need a longer test and comparable conditions to establish whether the thicker construction offers a meaningful durability benefit. Until then, the review’s conclusion remains a balance of reported short-term performance against the Nutrak tube’s weight, packed size and value.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What did road.cc report about the Nutrak TPU tube?
The review found that the tube worked without punctures or other problems during the test. The reviewer said that result was not enough to establish long-term durability.
How much does the Nutrak tube weigh?
The reviewer measured it at 56.8g; the product information in the supplied material lists 56g. The tube size associated with those figures is not specified.
How does its weight compare with other tubes in the review?
It was lighter than the reviewer’s 138.4g butyl tube, but heavier than two TPU tubes cited in the review: a 27.8g standard tube and a 48.9g gravel tube for 40–50mm tyres.
What is the reported advantage of the copper Presta valve?
The reviewer found the metal valve felt more robust than plastic valve stems on many lightweight TPU tubes and said this could suit some electric pumps. The manufacturer claims improved strength and corrosion resistance, but the supplied review does not include independent measurements of those claims.
Did the reviewer recommend buying it?
The reviewer gave the tube 5/10 overall and said they would not consider buying it, citing the weight and size penalty against other TPU tubes. That is the reviewer’s assessment, not a finding that the tube failed in testing.
Source: rss
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
